Learnaway
← All tools
Free teacher tool

AI Use Policy Generator

Pick your subject, level and stance on generative AI - banned, allowed for limited support, or permitted with disclosure - and this tool writes a clear classroom AI-use policy you can paste into a syllabus, assignment brief or course page. Add optional notes on assessed work and how concerns are handled. Built in your browser, nothing stored.

Built by Learnaway

Set the rules on AI - then back them up with evidence, fairly.

Learnaway reads the writing process (paste behaviour, typing rhythm, timing) to surface homework that may warrant a conversation. Signals for teachers, never verdicts.

  • Reads the writing process - paste, typing rhythm, timing - not the prose.
  • Timing metadata only. No keylogger; never the characters a student types.
  • Signals to start a fair conversation - never a verdict.
Set an assignment freeSee the 30-second demo

Free plan · no card required · set up in two minutes.

How to use the AI Use Policy Generator

  1. 1

    Name your course

    Enter the subject and, optionally, the level or year the policy applies to.

  2. 2

    Choose your stance

    Select whether AI is not permitted, limited to support, allowed with disclosure, or freely permitted.

  3. 3

    Add optional notes

    Toggle in a line on assessed work and a supportive note on how concerns are handled.

  4. 4

    Copy into your syllabus

    Copy the generated policy straight into your syllabus, course page or assignment brief.

Why an explicit AI policy helps everyone

Most disputes about AI use come from silence, not defiance. If students don't know where the line is, some will cross it without meaning to and others will avoid useful tools out of fear. A short, explicit policy removes that ambiguity and is far easier to enforce fairly.

This generator lets you set a stance per task type. You might ban AI on an in-class essay, allow it for brainstorming on a project, and require disclosure on a literature review - and produce clean wording for each.

Make the policy enforceable, not just aspirational

A policy works best when students understand both the rule and the reason, and when you have a fair way to follow up on concerns. Learnaway supports this by surfacing how a piece of work was written - typing rhythm, paste behaviour, timing - as signals for a conversation, never as an accusation or a verdict.

Pair the policy with a short integrity statement students acknowledge on submission, so expectations are agreed up front rather than litigated afterwards.

Frequently asked questions

What should an AI use policy cover?
Where AI may and may not be used, whether students must disclose it, how disclosure works, and what happens if the policy isn't followed - kept short and specific to your tasks.
Should I ban AI completely?
That's your call. Many teachers ban it for assessed writing but allow it for ideas or feedback. The key is to be explicit and consistent rather than silent.
Can I edit the generated policy?
Yes - it's a starting point. Adjust the wording to match your institution's rules and your own expectations before publishing it.
Does this cover ChatGPT specifically?
Yes. The policy applies to all generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot and similar, so you don't need a separate rule for each one.

Popular searches

  • chatgpt policy for schools example
  • ai academic honesty policy
  • responsible ai use in the classroom
  • student ai disclosure statement
  • ai policy for university courses
  • acceptable use of ai for students

Related tools